ecept
 
Sections
Topics

2001 Co-PI Meeting

Student Teachers


CETP Websites
ACEPT
(Arizona)
CETP-PA
(Pennsylvania)
CRC:STNM
(New York)
EATP
(Michigan)
FCEPT
(Fresno)
FCETP
(Florida)
KCETP
(Kansas)
LaCEPT
(Louisiana)
LACTE
(Los Angeles)
LBESTEP
(Long Beach)
MASTEP
(San Jose)
MCTP
(Maryland)
MMSTEC
(Maine)
MSMCI
(Soutwest Texas)
New Mexico CETP
NDSU-COMSTEP
(North Dakota)
NYCETP
(New York)
OCEPT
(Oregon)
OTEC
(Oklahoma)
PETE
(El Paso)
Philadelphia CETP
Project TEACH
(Washington)
PRCETP
(Puerto Rico)
RMTEC
(Colorado)
STEMTEC
(Massachusetts)
STEP
(Montana)
S-CETP
(Sacremento)
techknow
(Iowa)
TxCETP
(Texas)
UIC-CC CETP
(Chicago)
UTeach
(UT Austin)
VCEPT
(Virginia)
CETP Evaluation

 
THE TEAMS ASU - CHANDLER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER
posted by Rod on Sunday December 03, @04:55PM
ACEPT Frederick A. Staley
Faculty Coordinator for TEAMS
College of Education
Arizona State University

What is TEAMS?

TEAMS -Teacher Education for Arizona Math and Science is in its sixth year at Arizona State University. In July 2000, the program became a collaborative between Chandler Unified School District and Arizona State University. This institutionalization within the College of Education (COE) is now called the TEAMS ASU - Chandler Professional Development Center.


TEAMS is a science and mathematics secondary masters degree and certification program that also provides a middle level endorsement. The program was created as part of a National Science Foundation grant with the ASU Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (ACEPT) over the past five years. Beginning this year program support comes from the COE and the Arizona Teacher Excellence Coalition (AzTEC), a multiple university/community college collaborative that encompasses the entire state of Arizona.

The major purpose of TEAMS is to increase the quality and quantity of middle level science and mathematics teachers for the state of Arizona and beyond.

Why the Need for TEAMS?

Middle level science and mathematics education is in a crisis. These recent words provide a national perspective of this need:

"Many middle-grades teachers lack the deep subject matter knowledge they need to help their students meet ever-increasing academic standards." (Ann Bradley and Kathleen Manzo (October 4, 2000). "The Weak Link," Education Week - Special Issue on Middle Grades: Feeling the Squeeze).
"The middle school is the crux of the whole problem and really the point where we begin to lose it. In math and science, the middle grades are an intellectual wasteland." (William H. Schmidt (July 2000), Mathematics and Science in the Eighth Grade: Findings From the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. National Center for Education Statistics.

These comments point to two problems TEAMS is attempting to address: 1) the need for improved middle level education and 2) the need for increased preparation of middle level teachers in mathematics and science. In Arizona we have a statewide teacher shortage in science and mathematics and of those who do go into teaching, there is a 40% attrition rate within the first 5 years of teaching (AzTEC, March 24, 2000). Part of the problem is that we don't recruit, educate, graduate, and then support beginning teachers enough in Arizona. As the recent National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century urged, "We need aggressive recruitment to attract new teachers, accompanied by aggressive, and simultaneous effort to improve teacher preparation (Before It's Too Late: A Report to the Nation, September 27, 2000)."

Addressing the need for improvement in middle level education Lisa Graham Keegan, Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, declared: "We need to explore what is happening in our middle schools. We need serious study of our curriculum from the 4th to 8th grades ((September 28, 2000, The Arizona Republic)."

How is TEAMS addressing this Problem?

College of Education personnel who make up the TEAMS staff and faculty decided six years ago that there were many individuals in society with degrees in science, mathematics and engineering who might be interested in teaching careers. These post-baccalaureate individuals might be recent graduates, in mid career or even in retirement. We knew there also might be a large number of retired military personnel who might still have many years to give to a science or mathematics teaching career. Furthermore, we were convinced that with the right encouragement and program we could prepare these individuals to be successful middle school teachers.

In our first year of conducting a needs assessment, researching similar programs, and planning the curriculum we concluded that to attract these post-baccalaureate individuals the program had to be "fast-tract (one year)," provide both Secondary Certification and a Master's Degree in Secondary Education, and incorporate a great deal of field experience in schools and classrooms where TEAMS students could work with exemplary mentor teachers.

We enrolled 10 students and 9 completed during the first year. In the second year we enrolled 12 students and 12 completed.

While not producing the quantity of students we wanted, the program was rich in its emphasis on the middle school concept, philosophy and curriculum, the unique needs of the early adolescent child, the most recent ideas about teaching science and mathematics to early adolescents, and the authentic incorporation of technology into the curriculum. The TEAMS students were also working as a cohort group and a great deal of effort went into establishing the group as both a problem solving body and as a support system for one another. Again, we knew from both research and our own collective pasts that being part of a cohort was a key ingredient for mature adults to have a successful return to a university setting to further their education.

Our program took a drastic turn when we found ways to use technology to recruit students nationally and internationally. Our web site and participation in science and mathematics education list serves greatly increased the number of inquiries and applications to the TEAMS program. We now have a 1/2 time staff person who serves as the recruiter and academic advisory/counselor for TEAMS. With our Chandler Public Schools collaboration we can offer a better-coordinated set of field and student teaching experiences as part of the program. Chandler also provides a classroom in the district where the TEAMS course work occurs. The number of qualified middle and secondary science and mathematics teachers in Chandler, however, sets the limit on the number of TEAMS students we can have in the program at any one time.

Who are the TEAMS Students and How Many Have We Prepared?

The following provides a brief sketch of the 94 students who have completed or currently are in the program:

TEAMS Students' Demographics
1996 - 2000 = 94 students
From 20 States, Canada, Mexico, and Senegal
Females = 49 Males = 45
"Minorities" = 13
Science Degrees = 64 Math Degrees = 27 Both = 3
Age:
25 or less = 26 26-35 = 40 36-45 = 17 46 and older = 10

The growth of TEAMS over its first five years is outlined in the following:

Growth of TEAMS Program 1996-2000
Year Enrolled Completed Took Teaching Position Still Teaching (9-1-00) Went Back University Not in Education Now
1996-971097423
1997-98121212813
1998-992222222002
1999-002323201922
2000-0128 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Total
Completing
95666151510

Note: The number of TEAMS students Not in Education Now (10) divided by the total number of students who have completed the program 66 = an attrition rate of about 15%.

How Well Prepared are the TEAMS Students?

We have conducted both qualitative and quantitative research on the TEAMS students and the impact of the TEAMS program on them. Our students have shown significant growth in their attitudes toward teaching science (see Technical Report No. PRG00-1A) and have scored higher than their graduating peers in other teacher education programs at ASU in their overall satisfaction of their program (Educational Benchmarking Inc. Report). When compared to secondary education majors in the reformed ACEPT program and non-ACEPT graduates in both middle school and secondary education programs, TEAMS students performed at a significantly higher level on the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) in their student teaching as well as first, second and third year of teaching (see Beginning Teacher evaluation: Technical Report).

Analyses of Pre-and Post-test Concept Maps on the concept of "Teaching/Learning of Science" or "Teaching/Learning of Mathematics" as well as analyses of TEAMS' students field experience journals further indicate significant growth in their awareness of many reformed methods of teaching and a priority on active student roles in the classroom (see Technical Report No. PRG00-2).

Where Does TEAMS Go From Here?

TEAMS is now institutionalized within the COE and operates as a true collaborative with the Chandler Public Schools. The mission of TEAMS has thus increased to not only increase the quality and quantity of middle school mathematics and science teachers but to help reform the science and mathematics programs and teaching in the Chandler Public School System. Working toward reform in the school district is a "win-win" situation for the district for the TEAMS program because, if successful, the district and its teachers are in a better position to help in the effective preparation of middle school science and mathematics teachers while they are better meeting the needs of their own students.

At TEAMS and within the COE there is a recognition that there are still many post-baccalaureate individuals who would like to become certified middle and secondary teachers but who can't take a year off work to complete an intense program like TEAMS. These individuals are not only in science and mathematics but all curricular areas found in secondary education. Based on the TEAMS model the COE has created an evening/Saturday secondary teacher certification program called INtegrated Certification In Teacher Education -Secondary (See http://sundial.ed.asu.edu/teams/incite.htm for more information on INCITE-Secondary). This program is offered in the Chandler Public Schools with courses and integrated field experiences with teachers and students offered in the evening and on Saturday in the district.

Technical Reports:

Arizona Teacher Excellence Coalition (March 24, 1999). AriZona Teacher Excellence Coalition - Power Point Presentation. Tempe, AZ: AZTEC.

Educational Benchmarking Inc. (July, 2000). Teacher Education Student Benching Project Report for ASU. Springfield, MO: EBI.

Judson, E. & Sawada, D. (April 2000). Beginning Teacher Evaluation: Technical Report, Grades 5-12. Tempe: AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.

Piburn, M. (No Date). TEAMS Evaluation 1996-1998: Analysis of Attitudinal Variables. (Technical Report No. PRB00-1A). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.

Sawada, D (Rough Draft). TEAMS Evaluation 1999. (Technical Report No. PRG00-2).Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.


National Science Foundation Arizona State University Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology

ACEPT | home

[ National Science Foundation | National Science Teachers Association
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics | National Association for Research in Science Teaching ]