ecept
 
Sections
Topics

2001 Co-PI Meeting

Student Teachers


CETP Websites
ACEPT
(Arizona)
CETP-PA
(Pennsylvania)
CRC:STNM
(New York)
EATP
(Michigan)
FCEPT
(Fresno)
FCETP
(Florida)
KCETP
(Kansas)
LaCEPT
(Louisiana)
LACTE
(Los Angeles)
LBESTEP
(Long Beach)
MASTEP
(San Jose)
MCTP
(Maryland)
MMSTEC
(Maine)
MSMCI
(Soutwest Texas)
New Mexico CETP
NDSU-COMSTEP
(North Dakota)
NYCETP
(New York)
OCEPT
(Oregon)
OTEC
(Oklahoma)
PETE
(El Paso)
Philadelphia CETP
Project TEACH
(Washington)
PRCETP
(Puerto Rico)
RMTEC
(Colorado)
STEMTEC
(Massachusetts)
STEP
(Montana)
S-CETP
(Sacremento)
techknow
(Iowa)
TxCETP
(Texas)
UIC-CC CETP
(Chicago)
UTeach
(UT Austin)
VCEPT
(Virginia)
CETP Evaluation

 
Should Computers Be Banned From Schools?
posted by Rod on Thursday July 27, @02:49PM
Ecept A recent article posted on the web reports on a study which concludes that computers should be kept out of the classroom until at least the fourth grade with some researchers recommending that computers shouldn't be introduced to students until junior high or high school. Given that many of the CETP programs have a very strong technology component embedded within them, these types of studies should be looked at carefully. To provide a counter-point, we've asked Tom Brush a Co-PI on the Arizona Teacher Excellence Coalition to respond to the article.

Update: The original article has since disappeared, but another shot in this debate has been fired by a group called the Alliance for Childhood. This new article is from the San Jose Mercury.


Tom Brush writes:

Drs. Healy, Sloan, and Roszak are stating what we in the educational technology field have known for years: computers aren't very good teachers. The problem is that they (and other critics of the use of technology in educational settings) are focusing on the wrong problem. No, computer's aren't very good teachers. They are, however, excellent learning tools when used appropriately. Dr. Healy's comment that "computers stifle learning and creativity" could just as appropriately be applied to "educational" films and other common classroom resources such as the blackboard, overhead projector, textbooks, and certain library resources such as encyclopedias.

The point is that computers, when used appropriately in learning situations, can offer students and teachers resources that would be impractical or impossible to access in any other way. Do we really want to bar access to children under the fourth, seventh, or ninth grade (depending on which of the above authors you believe) with access to some of the wonderful learning opportunities that this technology can provide when used effectively? I think not!

For a glimpse of some of the learning possibilities technology can offer, I urge interested readers to look at the projects coming out of the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, the Media Lab at MIT, or the Center for Excellence in Education at Indiana University.

In conclusion, I believe that "banning" computers from any student is a mistake. While I don't believe that educators are necessarily using technology appropriately with all students and in all situations, there is tremendous potential for supporting new and exciting learning activities. It's up to researchers, developers, and educators to continue to strive towards more appropriate uses of technology in K-12 settings.


The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
computers in the classroom (Score:0)
by Anonymous on Friday July 28, @02:19PM
Interesting topic, certainly there is a need for teacher education with respect to the use of computers in the classroom, but banning the use of computers in the classroom would be rediculous. Especially to low income students whose only chance to gain access to technology is at school. Let's not forget the importance of the ability to use this tool, it's dominating the world economy and the ability to use computers in and off itself is a valuable asset to our youth. The fact that more research needs to be done on successful content/technology integration is no reason to "through the baby out with the bathwater" In short, the absence of computers in public education would make the "digital divide" look more like the Grand Canyon.

National Science Foundation Arizona State University Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology

Ecept | home

[ National Science Foundation | National Science Teachers Association
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics | National Association for Research in Science Teaching ]